2017 chevy volt driver#

All in all, whilst it isn't the sharpest vehicle to drive, the Chevrolet Volt also won't provide an unengaging drive for the sort of buyer who cares about that sort of thing вЂ“ and is far superior to what a Toyota Prius offers in this regard.

The steering is fairly direct in its responsive, meaning you can place the car where you want it on the road relatively comfortably, and the body control is fairly good bar a little bit of noticeable body lean when cornering (an unusual aspect to find in a hybrid, considering the mass of the batteries should make the center of gravity nice and low). Granted, the fitment of low resistance tires is one of many reasons why the keener driving enthusiast would likely opt for a conventional gasoline-only compact car like a Mazda 3 or Ford Focus, but the Chevrolet Volt is still entertaining enough when you're behind the wheel. Hybrids aren't usually renowned for their handling prowess, but the Chevrolet Volt does fare rather admirably in this regard. That said, the rear seat backs do almost fold completely flat вЂ“ which, when you factor in the hatchback tailgate, means it's possible to fit a bicycle in the back if you're dextrous enough. At 10.6 cubic feet with the rear seat backs in place, the Chevrolet Volt is amongst one of the least practical hybrids on sale today (even the least spacious Toyota Prius has a trunk capacity of 24.6 cubic feet, and the relatively high load lip may make the loading and unloading of heavier items a bit tricky at times. Trunk space also isn't particularly great either. Factor in the limited amount of room in the foot well as a result of the battery packs that sit in the middle of the car, and it makes you wonder why the current Chevrolet Volt didn't follow in the footsteps of its predecessor and remain a four-seater car. Thanks to the raised seat cushion, the already compromised head room is reduced even further, and the narrowness of the seat means three adults won't fit comfortably in the back.

2017 chevy volt driver#

Though space up front for the driver and the passenger riding shotgun is fine, the space in the rear is particularly compromised, with the relatively restricted head and leg room for the outboard seats meaning taller passengers will find it rather snug in the back. Plus, the standard-fit 8-inch touchscreen interface is also pretty simple to navigate, thanks to its clear resolution, responsiveness to inputs and its well laid out design.ДЄs much as the Chevrolet Volt gets overall intuitiveness right, it also falls short of being particularly practical. Replacing the unintuitive touch capacitor sensors on the old Chevrolet Volt's dashboard center console are an array of well laid out buttons and knobs that are far more straightforward to operate when on the move. Admittedly, the plastics used are a tad hard considering the car's higher asking price, but the Chevrolet Volt's interior doesn't feel cheaply made, and all of the major pieces feel like they're well put together. Thankfully, those wrongs have been righted with the current Chevrolet Volt. Plus, scratch below the sci-fi-esque aesthetics, and the overall quality of the materials wasn't that amazing either.

Whilst the futuristic vibes were certainly appreciated, they didn't especially lend themselves to intuitiveness or ease of use. One of the more prominent complaints with the old Chevrolet Volt regarded the overall execution of the interior.